carehealth

Losing a grandma, especially in teenage boys, can result in long-lasting depression.

4,897 predominantly low-income youngsters and their parents provided the data.

This loss is a "major risk factor for depression," according to authors.

Teenage boys exhibit a 50% rise in depressive symptoms up to seven years following their grandmother's passing.

In a recent Penn State study, researchers discovered a strong link between depression and the loss of a grandmother.

According to the study's findings, teenage guys were more likely than girls to experience depression.

The study, which was published in SSM - Mental Health, examined data from 4,897 children and parents, many of whom were from low-income families.

Teenagers who were not grieving a loss were shown to have depression symptoms that were only 50% as severe in adolescent boys up to seven years after the death of their grandmother.

According to the study's authors, it was vital for society to comprehend how big of a risk this loss constituted for developing depression.

related products

Study finds that optimism is essential for a long life. Air pollution increases mortality risk by 20%.

According to a study, human brains can reach around 41°C.

According to the study's authors, Ashton Verdery, Harry and Elissa Sichi Early Career Professor of Sociology, Demography, and Social Data Analytics at Penn State, "Just because these experiences are common does not mean the losses are not a source of great sadness for many, and possibly a risk factor for worse health outcomes among a subset of them."

In COVID-19, a few of the authors had been researching bereavement. According to the team's calculations, the pandemic caused the loss of a grandmother for approximately four million children and teenagers in America.

 million children and teenagers in America.

In addition to facing school closures, social exclusion, and ensuing isolation, millions of young people are also mourning the loss of a grandparent.

The more youthful we feel, the better we recover.

As scientists find evidence that people who feel younger than their chronological age are often healthier and more psychologically resilient, the adage "you're only as old as you feel" becomes more and more accurate.

A recent study from Bar-Ilan University discovered that, even in old age, having a youthful outlook can boost the likelihood of full recovery from medical issues. Their research was just released in the Gerontology journal.

Researchers followed 194 persons, aged 73 to 84, who were receiving treatment for osteoporotic fractures or strokes at various rehab centres throughout Israel.

Patients were questioned on their subjective age (how young they felt), feelings, and experiences at various points during their recuperation. Using the Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) exam, nurses assessed their degree of functioning prior to admission and after release.

Whether they had suffered a fracture or a stroke, patients who felt younger at the time of hospital admission displayed improved functional independence when they were released about a month later.

The researchers also discovered that people who felt younger recovered more quickly because they had greater hope for regaining their functioning abilities.

The study's co-authors, Professors Amit Shrira and Ehud Bodner, both of the Interdisciplinary Social Sciences department at Bar-Ilan University, claimed it "confirmed the influence of subjective age at admission on functional independence at discharge."

How to eat fruit throughout the day properly

Fruits are nature's dessert since they are sweet enough to satisfy your sugar cravings and nutritious enough to give your body additional nutrients. They provide your body with the nutrients it needs to keep active by serving as a source of minerals, vitamins, and fibre. It is important for us to eat fruit in some capacity, whether that be eating it alone or incorporating it into meals. However, it's crucial to consume particular fruits at particular times of the day in order to reap the full benefits that fruit has to offer.

Find out which fruit to eat at what time of day and its advantages, as compiled by News 18.

a morning stomach that is empty

Consuming fruit that will benefit your digestive system at this time is ideal. It's essential that the fruit you consume aids in gut cleansing, thus it's better to choose fruits that are high in fibre. Bananas, watermelons, papayas, guavas, mangoes, pomegranates, and other extremely fibrous fruits also have the added benefit of aiding in constipation relief.

Morning

Fruit of any kind in the morning is very healthy because it gives us energy. Fruits like pineapple, cherries, kiwis, strawberries, and apples are the greatest at breaking down the beneficial carbs they contain to provide our bodies the energy they need. Due to their anti

kiwis and strawberries serve to strengthen your immune system, while pineapple and cherry help manage blood pressure, lowering the risk of heart disease. Due to their detoxifying properties, apples are also fantastic if you're trying to lose some tummy fat.

Afternoon

Nutritionists believe that afternoon snacks should mostly consist of fruits with high sugar content. Our bodies are starting to get tired at this stage, so they need an energy boost. Consuming high-sugar foods that can elevate blood sugar levels will help you achieve this. As a result, fruits like mangoes and bananas that are high in sugar will provide you the energy you need throughout the day.

Pre-workout

You must get the quick energy boost from pre-workout fruits to perform hard at the gym. Apples, oranges, and pears are among the fruits that are a great source of energy and can help you get through a tough workout.

Night

It's crucial to avoid eating fruit right before bed because doing so will merely raise your blood sugar levels, make it difficult for you to fall asleep, and possibly cause you to gain weight. However, you can eat fruit a few hours before night to calm your body and provide it the nutrition it needs. Among the fruits that are best ingested at night are kiwis, pineapples, and avocados.

Have a comment to make about the story? Let us know in the comments section.

The evidence is solid but not yet conclusive, according to a professor who edited recent mortality findings.

Research from the past has suggested that drinking coffee may lower mortality and protect against diabetes and cancer. Contrary to worries that sweetness would cancel out the

 benefits of the beverage, a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine claims that adding a little sugar to your cup did not diminish documented mortality effects. In fact, the study found that daily coffee drinkers had up to 30% lower mortality rates over a seven-year period than non-drinkers, even when they added a teaspoon of sugar. Associate professor at Harvard Medical School Christina Wee edited the research and also wrote a supplementary editorial. She discussed the results with the Gazette in an interview. The conversation has been altered for

Q&A

Where are we with coffee science and its health advantages, Christina Wee GAZETTE?

WEE: In general, coffee consumers seem to have a significantly lower risk of mortality than non-drinkers. The majority of the available information is from from observational cohort studies, which compare coffee drinkers and non-drinkers over time. There are also a few smaller Mendelian randomization studies that, instead of directly evaluating coffee consumption, look at genetic markers that are linked to caffeine metabolism and are, in essence, indications of who might handle coffee better and so be more inclined to drink coffee. The next step is to see whether those with such genetic make-up—a proxy for a higher propensity of drinking coffee—perform better. These investigations have mainly

These studies do, however, contain some flaws. Mendelian randomization is a good study design since you don't have to worry as much about confounding, or whether the better results are truly due to coffee consumption being linked to some other health habit. The genetic indicators of coffee use, however, are only marginally predictive of actual coffee consumption. It might only be somewhat more likely to drink coffee even if you have a genetic marker for coffee tolerance. It's comparable to randomly assigning participants to drink coffee in a trial, but only a small number of them really do, so you can't be certain that there isn't a difference.

In a randomised trial, only a small portion of the participants who were assigned to drink coffee actually do so. As a result, when no difference is observed, it is impossible to determine whether this is due to a lack of compliance on the part of the participants in the coffee group or whether there were insufficient participants in the coffee group.

"Despite the possible health advantages, I wouldn't recommend starting to drink coffee if you don't already and don't truly enjoy it. That's a big jump.

Does that imply that the verdict is still out? GAZETTE

WEE: The verdict isn't in yet. Smaller physiological investigations, however, seem to indicate that some coffee constituents might also be advantageous. Coffee's chlorogenic acids and caffeine both appear to have antioxidant properties and prevent platelet aggregation. We first consider whether an impact is biologically reasonable whenever we observe one in observational studies. Coffee is one such drug that appears to have some advantageous physiological effects that may contribute to the declines in mortality that we are currently witnessing. All of this therefore provides corroborating evidence, not proof.

GAZETTE: One of the things I've heard over the years is that adding a lot of cream and sugar to your coffee may counteract any potential benefits. That particular question was addressed in this study, right?

WEE: In a certain way. They especially examined whether coffee consumption with added sugar or artificial sweeteners was still potentially advantageous or at the very least not harmful when compared to individuals who did not consume coffee. Furthermore, these researchers discovered that moderate coffee drinking with a small amount of added sugar was still significantly associated with lowered mortality risk. They did not examine coffee with extra cream or milk.

particularly. Additionally, they did not make a direct comparison between consuming coffee with and without sugar. As a result, we are unable to determine whether drinking coffee with sugar is superior to drinking coffee without sugar from a statistical perspective. The only thing we can really draw from this is that folks who drink coffee and add a little sugar still perform significantly better than those who don't.

GAZETTE: If you had to summarise where science stands today, where does that leave us?

What we can say with the greatest degree of assurance is that moderate coffee use is probably not dangerous. If you regularly consume up to three cups of coffee each day, you should be alright. You'll probably be alright if you add a little sugar. And it might even be advantageous to consume coffee this way. However, given that the evidence is still inconclusive, it is difficult for me to advise individuals to start drinking coffee. Despite the possible health advantages, I wouldn't recommend starting to drink coffee if you don't already and don't particularly enjoy it. Such a leap!

What to do if you regularly consume four cups of coffee every day and want to add two to three tablespoons of sugar is the harder question to answer. I don't think adding a second teaspoon of sugar will make coffee hazardous if we accept the data that suggests that drinking coffee with one teaspoon of sugar may be beneficial. However, it depends on how many cups of caramel macchiatos you consume; then it's a different story. I'd use common sense to solve the problem. Consider your distance from the study's typical drinker, and then determine the likelihood that any of the findings apply to your behaviour.

Heart failure patients who are not married have a 58 percent higher risk of dying.

Patients who are not married were found to have greater rates of cardiovascular and all-cause deaths.

In a study presented at Heart Failure 2022, the scientific meeting of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), unmarried heart failure patients were shown to be less self-assured in their ability to manage their condition and to feel more socially confined. These distinctions might have made unmarried patients less likely to survive over the long term.

According to research author Dr. Fabian Kerwagen of the Comprehensive Heart Failure Center at the University Hospital Würzburg in Germany, "Social support helps people manage long-term problems." "Spouses may support the development of healthy habits, offer encouragement, and help with medication adherence, all of which may shorten life expectancy. In this study, single patients engaged in less social interactions and lacked the confidence to treat their heart failure than married individuals. We are examining if these elements might potentially help to explain the connection to survival.

According to earlier studies, being single indicates a worse prognosis for both the general population and those with coronary artery disease. The prognostic value of marital status in patients with chronic heart failure was examined in the post-hoc analysis of the Extended Interdisciplinary Network Heart Failure (E-INH) study.

1,022 patients who were hospitalised for decompensated heart failure between 2004 and 2007 made up the E-INH study's sample. Out of 1,008 patients who disclosed their marital status, 633 (63%) were married and 375 (37%) were single, including 195 widows, 96 people who had never wed, and 84 people who were either separated from their spouses or divorced.

At the outset, the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, a survey created especially for people with heart failure, was used to assess quality of life, social limits, and self-efficacy. The term "social constraint" describes how much a patient's capacity to engage in social interactions, such as engaging in hobbies and leisure activities or visiting friends and family, is impacted by their heart failure symptoms. Patients' perceptions of their capacity to stop heart failure exacerbations and handle consequences are referred to as self-efficacy. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire, depressive mood was evaluated.

(PHQ-9).

Regarding overall quality of life or depressive mood, married and unmarried patients did not differ from one another. In contrast to the married group, the singles group performed lower on the self-efficacy and social constraints tests.

In the course of a 10-year follow-up, 679 patients (67%) passed away. All-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.58, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] 1.31-1.92) and cardiovascular death (HR 1.83, 95 percent CI 1.38-2.42) were associated with increased risks of being single than married. With hazard ratios of 1.70 and 2.22 for all-cause and cardiovascular death, respectively, compared to the married group, widowed patients had the highest mortality risk.

"The relationship between marriage and longevity emphasises the significance of social support for patients with heart failure, an issue that has grown even more pertinent with social isolation during the epidemic," stated Dr. Kerwagen. In order to address any gaps, health providers might think about enquiring about the marital status and larger social network of their patients and recommending heart failure support groups. While education is important, healthcare professionals should also work to increase their patients' self-care confidence. We are developing a mobile health app that we hope will help people with heart failure manage their condition on a daily basis.

The purpose of this abstract is to examine the incidence of falls, visual acuity, and refractive status before and after first and second cataract surgeries.

Design and setting: Prospective observational study at eight public hospitals in Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth that serve as tertiary referral centres for ophthalmology.

Participants: Patients 65 years of age or older who underwent bilateral age-related cataract surgery between 2013 and 2016 were included in the study and were monitored for a maximum of 24 months following enrollment, or until six months after the second eye surgery, whichever was shorter.

Principal outcome metrics The main result is the adjusted incidence of falls for age and sex. Visual acuity and refractive error are secondary outcomes.

Results: 220 women made up the majority of the 409 participants, with a mean age of 75.4 years (SD, 5.4 years) (54 percent ). Prior to surgery, the age- and sex-adjusted fall incidence was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.95-1.43) per year; following the first eye surgery, it was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.63-1.04) per year; and following the second eye surgery, it was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.29-0.57) per year. The age- and sex-adjusted incidence of falls was similar before and after first eye surgery (0.81 [95 percent CI, 0.57-1.15] falls per year) for the 118 participants who underwent second eye surgery and took part in all follow-up visits, but it was lower after second eye surgery (0.32 [95 percent CI, 0.21-0.50] falls per year). Before surgery, the mean habitual binocular visual acuity (logMAR) was 0.32 (SD, 0.21), and 0.15 after (SD, 0.17)

following a second eye surgery.

Conclusions: The first eye surgery significantly improves vision in older cataract patients, but a second eye surgery is necessary to reduce the likelihood of falls. In addition to improving vision in older adults with cataracts, timely treatment for both eyes lowers their chance of damage from falls.

The known: Cataract surgery on the first eye lowers the risk of falls among seniors, but the impact on the second eye is less certain.

The new: After the initial eye operation, which restored binocular vision, the age- and sex-adjusted incidence of falls among older persons who had been referred for cataract surgery was 31% lower.

The implications: Providing timely and equal access to cataract surgery can reduce the risk of accidents caused by falls and promote healthy ageing.

In Australia, cataracts are the most common cause of vision impairment, despite the effectiveness and accessibility of cataract surgery.

2 A total of 2.7 percent (95 percent confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.5 percent) of non-Indigenous Australians aged 50 or older had cataract-related vision impairment (logMAR, 0.3 [Snellen, 6/12] or worse). 3 In Australia and other high-income nations, significant discrepancies in access to cataract surgery have been documented. 4

The frequency of falls among older people is reduced by 32% following cataract surgery, according to a meta-analysis of six quasi-experimental studies5 (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.96). However, the authors did not make a distinction between first- and second-time cataract surgery. The only expedited cataract surgery randomised controlled trial (RCT) (conducted in the UK) discovered that first eye cataract surgery reduced the fall rate by 34% (RR, 0.66; 95 percent CI, 0.45-0.96);6 the authors' subsequent second eye surgery RCT did not discover a statistically significant reduction (RR, 0.68; 95 percent CI, 0.39-1.19). The effects of first and second eye surgery on the frequency of falls resulting in hospitalisation have been studied using data linkage, but the results have been inconsistent, and not all potentially confounding factors have been taken into account.

account.8,9

Falls in Older People with Cataract: a Longitudinal Evaluation of Impact and Risk (FOCUS)10, a recent cohort study of fall risk, distinguished between the preventive effects of first eye surgery (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.67; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.92) and the influence of other factors, such as poor pre-surgery vision in the dominant eye (IRR, 2.20; 95 percent CI, 1.02-4.74) and significant

11 In this paper, we examine fall risk, as well as secondary outcomes such as visual acuity and refractive error, before and after first and second cataract surgeries.

Methods

The FOCUS study examined the effects of cataract surgery on falls, vision, and refractive status by prospective surveillance.

At eight Australian public hospitals, including the Sydney Eye, Westmead, Bankstown, and Royal North Shore Hospitals in Sydney, the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital in Melbourne, the Fremantle, Royal Perth, and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospitals, 10 patients 65 years of age or older were found on surgery waiting lists (1 October 2013 - 31 July 2016). (Perth). After receiving a letter inviting them to participate, potential participants were called by phone a week later to gauge their interest and check their eligibility. We rejected candidates from pre-recruitment evaluations if they made more than two errors on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire12, reported dementia, Parkinson's

Questionnaire,12 reported having dementia, Parkinson's disease, or a stroke, being unable to walk (either with assistance or without assistance), living in a residential care facility, having other serious eye conditions (such as glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration), planning a combined operation (such as trabeculectomy and cataract surgery), or not being able to complete study assessments in English. Following second eye surgery, participants were monitored for either six months or two years, whichever came first. Data collection was completed on June 30, 2018.

Assessments

Utilizing standardised methods, trained research assistants conducted baseline and follow-up assessments. About three months following surgery, follow-up exams were carried out; if the interval between the first and second surgeries was less than three months, they were skipped. Data on birthdate, gender, height, and weight

Data on height, weight, and sex were gathered from the beginning. At each study visit, a medical history was obtained along with physical and vision-related evaluations, including checks on self-reported medication use and doctor-diagnosed medical conditions (combined as a summary measure, the Functional Comorbidities Index, FCI13), physical activity (Incidental and Planned Exercise Questionnaire14), and physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery, SPPB15). The SPPB score (0–12; 0 = poorest, 12 = highest physical performance) was calculated by adding the component scores for a timed 4 m walk (m/s), standing balance for ten seconds in six stances (range, 0–60 s), and five sit–to–stand repeats (stands per second).

The participant's typical eyewear was noted, and the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart16 was used to test the participant's binocular and monocular high contrast visual acuity at 3 metres under standard room lighting with habitual distance correction (minimum, 480 lux). Using the Mars letter contrast sensitivity test17 at 50 cm, monocular and binocular contrast sensitivity were assessed. By applying the vector length equation |P| = [(S + C/2)2 + (-C/2cos2)2 + (-C/2sin2)2]—where S denotes spherical power, C denotes cylindrical power, and denotes the axis for sphero-cylindrical power stated in negative cylinder form—refractive error was calculated. 18 We present the percentage of participants who had at least moderate stereopsis (140 seconds of arc) on the Wirt circles, as determined by the Titmus Fly stereo test19.

Fall data

As "an unanticipated event in which the individual comes to rest on the ground, floor, or lower level," falls were the main effect. 20 From the start of the study until 24 months from the start date or six months after the second eye surgery, whichever came first, falls data were prospectively collected in monthly self-report calendars. If participants' monthly falls calendars were not returned, interviewers phoned them to ask about the details of any falls. Although they were not aware of our study premise, the interviewers confirmed the participants' scheduled surgeries.samples taken

The McNemar test power analysis, conducted in PASS 11 [NCSS], did not meet the FOCUS research recruitment target of 652 participants, which would have had a 90% chance of detecting a difference in proportions of 0.05.

10 The goal was determined using data from a pilot research, the fall prevalence in a previous study of cataract patients, a six-month observation period, and the proportions of discordant pairings (falls before and after surgery). The first 329 participants' data were used to evaluate the primary result (falls before21 and after first eye surgery11) as well as the secondary outcomes (depressive symptoms, physical activity, and fear of falling23). A sample size of 329 participants supplied 80% of the information because the drop in the number of falls was greater than expected.

a mean pre-surgery exposure length of 0.88 years and an overdispersion parameter of 1.5, and power to detect a reduction in fall incidence of 32%. Phase 2 recruitment ended in July 2016, and due to resource limitations, it was only possible to evaluate the key outcomes (falls and vision; Supporting Information); all gathered data were available for our analysis.

Statistic evaluation

There were three time periods established: before the first eye surgery (pre-surgery), between the first and second eye surgeries, and after the second eye surgeries. Data were classified as missing and not imputed if assessments were not completed. Descriptive statistics provide a summary of information on age, sex, health, and physical and visual abilities. We present baseline variations in baseline characteristics between participants who did not participate in the study and those who did.

not had surgery, have only had the first eye operated on, or have had both eyes operated on; and changes in vision characteristics over time. We calculated the incidence of falls and incident rate ratios for the three time periods using a negative binomial regression model, which was confirmed to be appropriate by examining the dispersion parameter. To account for the three time periods' various lengths, we used the number of observation days as the offset. Based on our prior research11,21, we selected a minimally adjusted model that took into account the collinearity of vision-related factors and surgical status. Repeated measures in individuals were accounted for using an exchangeable correlation structure by participant. To account for the innate correlation of repeated measurements, generic linear models (in SAS Enterprise Guide 7.1) were utilised in all analyses.

To account for the intrinsic correlation of repeated measurements ( = 0.05), use Guide 7.1. The STROBE recommendation is followed in our study report. 24

ethical endorsement

The NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/CIPHS/25), Curtin University's HR 123/2013, and the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital's 13/1124H all approved the study's ethical conduct. Everyone who took part gave their signed, informed consent.

Results

416 out of 1664 invited participants accepted our invitation to take part in the study (25 percent ). Six were later eliminated because prospective falls data were unavailable, and one was eliminated because the dates of operation were noted in their hospital records.

and one because their hospital records' dates of surgery showed they did not initially have bilateral age-related cataracts. The average age of the 409 participants was 75.4, with an SD of 5.4 years, and 220 of them were female (54 percent ). During the study period, 63 patients (15%) did not get cataract surgery. For 346 participants, the median period from enrollment to the first eye operation was 176 days (interquartile range [IQR], 89-321 days). The median duration between the first and second eye surgeries was 265 days (IQR, 119-493 days), while the median time following the second eye operation was 211 days (IQR, 189-225 days). A total of 188 participants (46%) underwent second eye cataract surgery (Box 1).

Box 1 shows how the study's 416 enrolled participants progressed.

a visual display

When individuals were first included, their habitual vision was worse than that of those who later underwent second eye surgery (mean difference [logMAR], 0.09; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.04-0.15) or underwent no surgery (mean difference, 0.11; CI, 0.04-0.18). In comparison to participants who underwent first eye surgery only (mean difference in SPPB scores, 1.11 points; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.17-2.05 points) or both first and second eye surgery (mean difference, 0.99 points; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.07-1.91 points), people who did not have cataract surgery had worse baseline physical function. The three groups' initial features were comparable overall (Box 2).

Box 2 lists the 409 study participants' initial characteristics (at the time of enrollment)

The 118 patients who underwent first and second eye cataract surgery and took part in all follow-ups saw improvements in their bilateral log contrast sensitivity and binocular habitual visual acuity following each procedure. 58 participants (52%) had anisometropia of 1.00 dioptre or more at baseline, 85 after the first operation (79%) and 36 after the second operation. The mean anisometropia was 1.38 (SD, 1.71) dioptres at baseline, 2.68 (SD, 2.94) dioptres after first eye surgery, and 1.12 (SD, 1.72) dioptres after second eye surgery (33 percent ). After surgery, the average refractive error was lower than it was before (first operated eye: 1.08 [SD, 1.86] v 2.62 [SD, 1.23] dioptres; second operated eye: 1.31 [SD, 1.65] v 2.52 [SD, 1.87] dioptres) (Box 3).

Box 3 shows the visual features of 118 participants who underwent both first and second cataract surgery and took part in all follow-ups before and after both procedures.

to open in a new window

Falls frequency

Surpassing expectations by 66%, participants submitted 5139 completed falls calendars by mail. During follow-up phone conversations, interviewers also obtained additional falls information from 379 participants. Falls incidence adjusted for age and gender occurred at a rate of 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95–1.43) per year before to surgery, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.63–1.04) per year following first eye surgery, and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.29–0.57) per year following second eye surgery (Box 4).

Box 4 shows the annual incidence of falls and the state of eye cataract surgery.

to open in a new window

The age- and sex-adjusted incidence was 0.80 (95 percent CI, 0.55-1.15) falls per year before surgery, 0.81 (95 percent CI, 0.57-1.15) falls per year after first eye surgery, and 0.32 falls per year (95 percent CI, 0.21-0.50) after second eye surgery. This analysis was restricted to the 118 participants who underwent second eye surgery and participated in all follow-ups (Box 5).

Box 5 displays the incidence of falls by eye cataract surgery status for 118 participants who underwent both first and second eye surgeries and participated in all follow-ups.

to open in a new window

Discussion

Around the world, cataract is a leading cause of vision impairment, but whether cataract surgery is fairly funded is up for contention in Australia26 and other countries.

4 We present data demonstrating the critical role that prompt access to both first and second eye cataract surgery plays in enhancing mobility and visual function in older patients with bilateral cataract. About 250 000 cataract procedures are conducted annually in Australia, with a third taking place in public facilities. 2 An earlier Australian study discovered that elderly patients with bilateral cataracts on public hospital waiting lists experience unusually high rates of falls, with 50% of these falls resulting in injury. 21 When binocular vision function is fully recovered after second eye surgery, we discovered that the fall rate decrease is larger.

Some apparent discrepancies between past publications are resolved by our findings. In order to determine the effect of cataract surgery on the frequency of falls resulting in hospitalisation, some writers have used administrative data. 8,9 Cataract surgery was linked to a lower rate of falls in a study of matched Medicare beneficiaries in the United States who had cataracts but had not undergone the procedure (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.81-0.87). 9 In contrast, a study conducted in Western Australia discovered that both first and second cataract surgeries increased the risk of falls. 8 The effect of first eye surgery on fall risk was found to be statistically significant by the only relevant RCTs, but not by the effect of second eye cataract surgery. 7 Our discovery showed a second eye operation had a bigger effect on the incidence of falls

The results of a smaller Australian cohort study are consistent with the finding that second eye surgery had a bigger effect on fall incidence (55 participants). 27

Less than half of the study participants had both their first and second eye surgeries within the 24 months that were being looked at. Participants' profiles who received surgery on either eye, both eyes, or neither eye were identical. However, the disparities in physical function by surgical status show that external factors, such as competing health objectives and capacities, may influence the scheduling of surgery. People with worse vision may be expected to undergo surgery sooner.

As anticipated, measures of visual performance increased after cataract surgery, but vector analysis revealed anisometropia (i.e., a difference in refractive power between the eyes) in 79 percent of participants who had surgery on both eyes. This difference in refractive power was at least 1.0 dioptre. Only 102 out of 196 patients who had their first eye surgery had their prescription for eyeglasses alter within three months after the procedure, and the 63 patients who had significant changes (0.75 dioptre or more) were most at risk for falling. 11 According to these results, the interval between the first and second cataract operations should be kept to a minimum in order to allow for timely and adequate spectacle updates following the second procedure, which lowers between-eye disparities in refractive error.

Limitations

Our observational study cannot infer any causal relationships. Even though not all subjects underwent first and second cataract surgeries, our analyses were nonetheless modified to account for the various exposure times. To characterise our sample and investigate potential sources of selection bias, we gathered extensive data on visual status, physical function, and health-related risk factors for falls. However, certain tests could not be performed due to the timing of surgery. Prospective monthly falls reporting is advised for measuring the key outcome, fall incidence, as it was based on self-report and prone to reporting bias. 20 They were presumably not typical of all candidates for cataract surgery or of the general population because only 25% of possible participants volunteered to participate in our study.

people who were waiting for cataract surgery at a public hospital but may have been more mobile candidates who might travel for study evaluations. Residents of senior living communities were not included. Comparatively to individuals who have cataract surgery from private sector providers, our participants most likely come from lower socioeconomic status backgrounds. Many of these restrictions could be avoided in the planned randomised control study.

Conclusion

Our work adds to the body of research that shows older adults should be given prompt access to cataract surgery because it is a low-cost method of enhancing eyesight and reducing falls.

28 In Australia, older patients with cataracts may have to wait a long time for both first and second eye cataract surgery in the public hospital system. The issue has grown worse as a result of postponing elective

in the public hospital system for both first and second eye cataract surgery. Delaying elective surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made the issue worse and is especially detrimental to those who depend on public hospital services. According to our research, timely and equitable access to cataract surgery is essential for promoting healthy ageing and injury prevention.

24 November 2021: Received; 31 March 2022: Accepted

Abbottabad's Livestock and Dairy Development creates a veterinary picket for tick-dusting.

On the eve of Eid-ul-Azha, Livestock and Dairy Development constructed a tick-dusting veterinary picket at Chamba point in the district of Abbottabad to combat the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus.

ABBOTTABAD, Pakistan Point News / UrduPoint - June 25, 2022:

On the eve of Eid-ul-Azha, Livestock and Dairy Development has set up a tick-dusting veterinary picket at Chamba point in the district of Abbottabad to combat the Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus.

Akbar Ali, the district's director of livestock and dairy development, has given district officers and paramedics responsibilities for containing the spread of animal diseases including the Congo virus.

To safeguard the cattle from these dangerous diseases, checkpoints have been set up, and staff has been told to spray the cattle before they approach the markets.

Under the direction of Dr. Sajid Hameed, the personnel of the Havelian Veterinary Hospital—including the assistant veterinarian and six other members—would carry out the task for 24 hours.

The sacrificed animals coming from Punjab and the rest of the nation to be sold in Abbottabad area are being sprayed by vets.